Welcome to Visited Lingnan Modern Clinics In Surgery, Today is

Lingnan Modern Clinics In Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (05): 330-336.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2025.05.008

• Original Articles and Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of factors affecting stigma in patients with breast cancer wounds and construction of a prediction model

LIN Ai-yi, WANG Xiu, LI Ling, QIU Liang-zhi, WU Xian-rong*   

  1. Chronic Wounds and Ostomy Specialist Unit, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Contact: WU Xian-rong, zeetwu@163.com

乳腺癌癌性伤口患者病耻感现状及影响因素预测模型构建

林爱怡, 王秀, 李玲, 邱良枝, 吴仙蓉*   

  1. 中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院慢性伤口、造口专科, 广州 510120
  • 通讯作者: *吴仙蓉,Email:zeetwu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    课题资助项目:广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(A2022294)

Abstract: Objective To explore the factors influencing stigmatization in patients with malignant breast cancer wounds, identify its core predictive factors, and construct and validate a clinical predictive model for stigmatization. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 67 patients using the following instruments: general information questionnaire, Stigma Scale for Chronic Illnesses 8-item version (SSCI-8), Toronto Wound Symptom Assessment System-Wounds(TSAS-W), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), and Quality of Life Instruments for Cancer Patients-Breast Cancer(QLICP-BR). Data analysis was performed using univariate analysis, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression analysis. Results The overall score for stigmatization was 13.3±5.76 points. Correlation analysis showed that stigmatization was significantly positively correlated with anxiety (r=0.537) and depression (r=0.464), and wound symptoms (r=0.389) (all P<0.05), strongly negatively correlated with quality of life (r=-0.718, P<0.01), and marginally significantly negatively correlated with social support (r=-0.229, P=0.062). Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that: Quality of life (β=-0.666, P<0.01) was the strongest negative predictor of stigma, while anxiety (β=0.234, P=0.088) and depression (β=-0.251, P=0.095) had marginal predictive effects. The final model explained 51.5% of the variance in stigmatization (adjusted R3=0.515, F=15.003, P<0.01). Conclusion Stigmatization in patients with breast cancer wounds has a significant statistical association with quality of life, and a marginally significant association with anxiety and depression levels. Wound management can be combined with a focus on enhancing patient quality of life and alleviating anxiety and depression, in order to reduce patients' level of stigmatization.

Key words: breast cancer wounds, stigma, influencing factors, predictive mode

摘要: 目的 调查乳腺癌癌性伤口患者病耻感现状,并探讨病耻感的影响因素,明确其核心预测因子,构建病耻感的临床预测模型。方法 采用一般资料问卷、慢性病病耻感量表(SSCI-8)、多伦多伤口症状评估系统(TSAS-W)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、社会支持评定量表(SSRS)、乳腺癌患者生命质量测定量表(QLICP-BR)对67例患者进行横断面调查。数据分析采用单因素分析、Pearson相关及多元线性回归分析。结果 病耻感总体得分(13.3±5.76)分;相关性分析显示,病耻感与焦虑(r=0.537)、抑郁(r=0.464)及伤口症状(r=0.389)呈显著正相关(均P<0.05),与生活质量呈强负相关(r=-0.718,P<0.01),与社会支持呈边缘显著负相关(r=-0.229,P=0.062)。多元线性回归分析显示:生活质量(β=-0.666,P<0.01)是病耻感最强的负向预测因子,焦虑(β=0.234,P=0.088)、抑郁(β=-0.251,P=0.095)呈边缘预测作用。最终模型解释病耻感51.5%变异(调整R2=0.515,F=15.003,P<0.01)。结论 对于乳腺癌癌性伤口患者,其病耻感与生活质量存在显著的统计关联,与焦虑和抑郁水平则存在边缘显著关联。处理伤口的同时可结合关注提升患者生活质量和缓解焦虑抑郁情绪,以降低患者的病耻感水平。

关键词: 乳腺癌性伤口, 病耻感, 影响因素, 预测模型

CLC Number: