欢迎访问《岭南现代临床外科》官方网站,今天是

岭南现代临床外科 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (03): 168-173.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2025.03.004

• 论著与临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺切除术中不放置引流的临床回顾性分析

艾青, 黄志恒*, 江将, 翁煜景   

  1. 香港大学深圳医院甲状腺外科,广东深圳 518053
  • 通讯作者: * 黄志恒,Email: huangzh@hku-szh.org

Clinical retrospective analysis of non-drainage in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach

AI Qing, HUANG Zhi-heng, JIANG Jiang, WENG Yu-jing   

  1. Department of Thyroid Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518053, China
  • Accepted:2025-02-10 Online:2025-06-20 Published:2025-08-14
  • Contact: HUANG Zhi-heng, huangzh@hku-szh.org

摘要: 目的 探讨经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺手术中不放置引流的安全性。方法 回顾性分析2021年8月至2024年4月期间本院实施的416例经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺手术患者。经筛选排除后,实际纳入386例,按照术中是否放置引流分为无引流组(观察组,145例)和引流组(对照组,241例)。比较两组的术后住院时间、疼痛评分、出血、血清肿、感染发生率等指标。结果 两组患者的手术时间及术后疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。两组术后出血、血清肿、感染、声音嘶哑及永久性甲状旁腺功能减退等术后并发症发生率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。引流组中行甲状腺全切术的患者比例显著高于无引流组(25/241 vs. 1/145, P=0.001)。引流组的术中预估出血量高于无引流组[10(5,10) mL] vs. [5(5,5) mL], P<0.001 ]。不放置引流组的术后住院时间显著短于引流组[2(2,2) vs. 3(2,3) d, P<0.001]。剔除全切患者后,仅比较两组单侧腺叶切除的数据,不放置引流组中术中出血量更少(P<0.001)、术后住院时间更短(P<0.001),其余指标无统计学差异。结论 经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺手术中,常规情况下不放置引流是安全且可行的,不增加术后出血、术后血清肿和术后感染的风险。

关键词: 经口腔前庭, 甲状腺手术, 引流

Abstract: Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of not placing a drainage tube during transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 416 cases of TOETVA performed at our hospital from August 2021 to April 2024. After exclusions, 386 cases were included and divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of drainage: the no-drainage group (145 cases) and the drainage group (241 cases). Postoperative hospital stays, pain scores, postoperative bleeding, seroma, and infection rates were compared between the two groups. Results No significant differences were observed in surgery time or postoperative pain scores.Postoperative complications, including bleeding, seroma, infection, hoarseness, and permanent hypoparathyroidism, showed no significant differences between the two groups. The proportion of patients who underwent total thyroidectomy was significantly higher in the drainage group than in the no-drainage group (25/241 vs. 1/145, P=0.01). Intraoperative predicted bleeding was higher in the drainage group than in the no-drainage group [10(5,10) mL vs. 5(5,5) mL, P<0.01]. Postoperative hospitalization was significantly shorter in the no-drainage group than in the drainage group [2(2,2) vs. 3(2,3) d; P<0.01]. After excluding total thyroidectomy patients, when comparing only unilateral lobectomy cases, significant differences were found in intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay. In the no-drainage group, intraoperative bleeding was less (P<0.001) and postoperative hospitalization was shorter (P<0.001), while other indicators showed no statistical differences. Conclusion Routine non-drainage in TOETVA is safe and feasible, not increasing the risk of postoperative bleeding, seroma, or infection.

Key words: transoral vestibular approach, thyroid surgery, drainage

中图分类号: