欢迎访问《岭南现代临床外科》官方网站,今天是

岭南现代临床外科 ›› 2025, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (06): 384-387.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2024.06.008

• 论著与临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

皮内缝合法与间断缝合法缝合头皮在额外侧入路手术中的比较

何山, 付涛, 王计伟, 张海红*   

  1. 天津市环湖医院神经外科,天津 300350
  • 通讯作者: * 张海红,Email:zhanghh0209@163.com

Comparison of intradermal and interrupted suture techniques for scalp closure in the frontolateral approach surgery

HE Shan, FU Tao, WANG Ji-wei, ZHANG Hai-hong   

  1. Department of Neurosurgery,Tianjin Huanhu Hospital,Tianjin 300350,China
  • Received:2024-10-25 Online:2024-12-20 Published:2025-01-14
  • Contact: ZHANG Hai-hong, zhanghh0209@163.com

摘要: 目的 探讨应用皮内缝合与间断缝合方法对额外侧入路中缝合头皮切口在缝合速度、术后切口甲级愈合率、术后瘢痕最大宽度及术后平均住院天数的差异。进而为神经外科额外侧手术入路的切口关闭提供新的策略。方法 选取2020年2月至2024年2月于就诊于天津市环湖医院神经外科并接受额外侧入路手术患者99例,以手术日期的奇数与偶数分成两组:间断缝合组(47例)、皮内缝合组(52例)。记录术中缝合时间、切口长度、患者术后切口愈合情况、术后住院时间、三个月后切口瘢痕最大宽度。结果 间断缝合组及皮内缝合组的缝合速度分别为1.99±0.62 cm/min、1.96±0.66 cm/min,三个月后切口瘢痕最大宽度分别为3.40±1.30 mm、1.96±0.90 mm,切口甲级愈合率分别为78.72%、96.15%。术后平均住院时间分别为11.13±2.87 d、8.71±3.11 d。两组间切口甲级愈合率、切口瘢痕最大宽度、术后平均住院时间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 与间断缝合法相比,应用皮内缝合法关闭额外侧入路手术切口可以提高术后切口甲级愈合率、缩短术后住院时间,不会增加手术时长,且具有术后瘢痕小、切口美观的优势。

关键词: 额外侧入路, 皮内缝合, 切口愈合, 间断缝合

Abstract: Objective To explore the differences between intradermal suturing and interrupted suturing techniques for scalp incision closure in the frontolateral approach surgeries, specifically regarding suturing speed, postoperative wound healing rates, maximum scar width, and average length of hospital stay. This study aims to provide a new strategy for incision closure in the frontolateral approach. Methods A total of 99 patients who underwent the frontolateral approach surgery at Tianjin Huanhu Hospital Neurosurgery Department from February 2020 to February 2024 were selected. Patients were divided into two groups based on the odd or even dates of their surgeries: the interrupted suture group (47 cases) and the intradermal suture group (52 cases). Data were recorded, including intraoperative suturing time, incision length, postoperative wound healing outcomes, length of hospital stay, and maximum scar width at three months postoperatively. Results The suturing speeds for the interrupted and intradermal suture groups were (1.99±0.62) cm/min and (1.96±0.66) cm/min, respectively. Three months postoperatively, the maximum scar widths were (3.40±1.30) mm for the interrupted suture group and (1.96±0.90) mm for the intradermal suture group. The rates of excellent wound healing were 78.72% for the interrupted suture group and 96.15% for the intradermal suture group. The average length of hospital stay was (11.13±2.87) days for the interrupted suture group and (8.71±3.11) days for the intradermal suture group. Comparisons between the two groups revealed statistically significant differences in rates of excellent wound healing, maximum scar width, and average length of hospital stay (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared to interrupted suturing, the use of intradermal suturing for closing incisions in the frontolateral approach surgeries can improve postoperative wound healing rates, shorten hospital stay durations, and does not increase surgical time. Additionally, it offers advantages of smaller and more aesthetically pleasing scars.

Key words: the frontolateral approach, intradermal suture, incision healing, interrupted suture

中图分类号: