Welcome to Visited Lingnan Modern Clinics In Surgery, Today is Share:

Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery ›› 2012, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03): 168-170.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Experimental research of liver regeneration degree and liver regeneration index after partial hepatectomy in two liver regeneration’s models .

  

两种肝再生模型肝切除术后肝再生指数和肝再生度的实验研究

刘国华,张谷裕,林满洲,李明意,杨永光,徐浩   

  1. 广东医学院附属医院
  • 通讯作者: 李明意
  • 基金资助:
    维生素K2通过SXR调控matrilin-2促进卵圆细胞增殖介导肝再生的研究

Abstract: 【Abstract】 Objective To investigate change of liver regeneration degree(LRD) and liver regeneration index(LRI) after partial hepatectomy in two different rats’liver regeneration models. Methods SD rats were randomized into 2 groups : ①liver regeneration models’group mediated by Hepatic cells proliferation (PH) ②liver regeneration models’group mediated by oval cells proliferation (2AAF/PH); LRD and LRI were calculated in the time points of 4、8、12、16、20days after liver resection. Results. PH group and 2AAF/PH group, LRD and LRI of POD(post operation day)4 increased significantly , and reached the peak on POD12 and the weight of residual liver was more than two-thirds of the total amount of regeneration. On POD20 residual liver almost reach the original liver heavy .And on POD4、8、12, LRD of PH group are higher than 2AAF/PH group ( P < 0.05). But on POD16, LRD of 2AAF/PH group are higher than PH group ( P < 0.05). On POD4、8, LRI of PH group are higher than 2AAF/PH group ( P < 0.05) and no statistical difference on POD12、16、20(P>0.05). Conclusions To evaluate change of liver regeneration quality, LRD and LRI are intuitive and precise index. But LRD is more accuracy than LRI in reflecting the liver regeneration regular.

Key words: Liver regeneration , Hepatectomy , LRD, LRI.

摘要: 【摘要】目的 探讨大鼠肝细胞增殖介导肝再生和卵圆细胞增殖介导肝再生两种不同大鼠肝再生模型肝切除术后肝再生指数和肝再生度变化的情况。方法 SD 大鼠随机分为2组: ①肝细胞增殖介导肝再生模型组(PH)②卵圆细胞增殖介导肝再生模型组(2AAF/PH) ,计算两组模型肝切除术后4、8、12、16、20天残肝肝再生度及肝再生指数。结果 两组肝再生度、肝再生指数均在第4天明显升高,12天左右达到高峰,超过再生总量的2/3以上,至20天基本达到原肝重。在4、8、12天同一时间点内,PH组肝再生度比2AAF/PH组高(P<0.05),而到16天时,2AAF/PH组肝再生度则比PH组高(P<0.05)。在4、8天同一时间点内,PH组肝再生指数比2AAF/PH组高(P<0.05)。在12、16、20天同一时间点内,两组肝再生指数无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论 肝再生度与肝再生指数是评价肝再生质量变化较直观和准确的指标,肝再生度在反映肝再生规律方面要比肝再生指数更准确。

关键词:  肝再生, 肝切除术, 肝再生度, 肝再生指数

CLC Number: