欢迎访问《岭南现代临床外科》官方网站,今天是

岭南现代临床外科 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (06): 352-359.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2025.06.002

• 论著与临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

广东省乳腺癌筛查效能评估及超声 BI-RADS 0/3 类人群管理策略优化分析

谢四梅1, 陈国珍2, 朱彩霞1, 伍彩霞1, 区俏彦1, 杨剑敏1, 张安秦1,*   

  1. 1.广东省妇幼保健院乳腺科,广州 511442;
    2.广东省妇幼保健院妇女保健科,广州 511442
  • 通讯作者: *张安秦,Email:130 542 933@qq.com

Breast cancer screening in Guangdong: efficacy assessment and management optimization for ultrasound BI-RADS 0/3 categories

XIE Si-mei1, CHEN Guo-zhen2, ZHU Cai-xia1, WU Cai-xia1, OU Qiao-yan1, YANG Jian-min1, ZHANG An-qin1   

  1. 1. Department of Breast Surgery, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou 511442, China;
    2. Department of Women's Health Care, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou 511442, China
  • Received:2025-10-05 Published:2026-01-28
  • Contact: ZHANG An-qin, 130542933@qq.com

摘要: 目的 评估筛查项目的实施效能,重点探讨超声BI-RADS分类为0类及3类人群中X线检查的增量诊断价值。方法 数据来源于广东省妇幼信息平台,最终纳入2024年参与广东省乳腺癌免费筛查项目的35~64岁适龄妇女共683 765例进行分析。结果 纳入研究人群基本特征在不同年龄组间分布差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001);各年龄组的组织病理学实查率差异无统计学意义,总体病理实查率为67.97%,乳腺癌检出率为120.66/10万。2024年广东省乳腺癌检出率随年龄增长呈上升趋势(χ2=169.549, P<0.001);以组织病理学检查结果为金标准,超声检查敏感性最高(79.88%),临床查体和X线检查敏感性较低(20.36%、22.06%),三种检查方法特异性均较高(99.04%~99.94%);超声0/3类人群中,X线检查使50.23%降级至1/2类,3.76%升级至4/5类,总体额外癌症检出率为26.62/10万。结论 超声检查作为乳腺癌初筛的主要手段,在筛查中具有核心诊断价值,敏感性显著高于其他检查方法。X线检查在超声0/3类人群中具有明确增量价值,既能避免不必要活检,又能识别额外癌症病例。

关键词: 乳腺癌, 筛查方法, 乳腺超声, BI-RADS 3类

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the implementation efficiency of the screening program, and to focus on the incremental diagnostic value of X-ray examination in people classified by ultrasound BI-RADS into 0 and 3 categories. Methods The data were collected from the Guangdong Women and Children Information Platform and finally included 683 765 women aged 35-64 who participated in the free breast cancer screening project in Guangdong Province in 2024 for analysis. Results There were significant differences in the distribution of basic characteristics among different age groups (P<0.001). This study revealed no significant differences in histopathology biopsy rates across age groups. Overall, the biopsyrate was 67.97%, with a breast cancer detection rate of 120.66 per 100,000. In 2024, the detection rate of breast cancer in Guangdong Province increased with age (χ2=169.549, P<0.001). Taking the results of histopathological examination as the gold standard, the sensitivity of ultrasound examination was the highest (79.88%), the sensitivity of clinical examination and X-ray examination was low (20.36%, 22.06%), and the specificity of the three methods was high (99.04%~99.94%). In the ultrasound category 0/3 population, X-ray examination downgraded 50.23% to category 1/2, and upgraded 3.76% to category 4/5. The overall detection rate of extra cancer was 26.62 per 100 000. Conclusion Ultrasound examination, as the main method of breast cancer screening, has the core diagnostic value in screening, and its sensitivity is significantly higher than other screening methods. X-ray examination provides definite incremental value for the ultrasound category 0/3 population, which can not only avoid unnecessary biopsy, but also identify additional cancer cases.

Key words: breast cancer, screening methods, breast ultrasound, BI-RADS 3

中图分类号: